Okta vs Supabase: Full Comparison (2026)
Pricing, features, scores, and a clear verdict on which one is right for you.
The bottom line
Okta positions itself as "the identity standard" while Supabase goes after "open-source firebase alternative with postgres" — so the right pick depends on which problem you're actually solving. They take different commercial approaches — Okta uses a subscription-based model and Supabase a freemium approach, which affects how costs scale as your team grows. Supabase lets you start for free, which means you can validate the fit before committing budget. Okta requires a paid commitment upfront, so make sure it matches your workflow before signing. Okta (founded 2009) has had more time to build out its ecosystem and integrations, while Supabase (2020) tends to move faster on modern UX and newer workflows.
At a glance
| Okta | Supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 87/100 | 88/100 |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Best for | The identity standard | Open-source Firebase alternative with Postgres |
Pricing comparison
Calculate your cost
Feature comparison
core
| Feature | Okta | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| SSO | Yes | No |
| MFA | Yes | No |
| Lifecycle management | Yes | No |
| SCIM provisioning | Yes | No |
| App catalog (7000+) | Yes | No |
| PostgreSQL database | No | Yes |
| Authentication | No | Yes |
| Storage | No | Yes |
| Edge Functions | No | Yes |
| Realtime subscriptions | No | Yes |
Ratings breakdown
What the data tells us
How costs scale
Supabase's pricing curve is steeper — the jump from its entry plan to its top tier is more dramatic than Okta's. If you're a growing team, model the 12-month cost at your projected team size, not just today's. Okta tends to stay more predictable as you add seats or usage.
Key capabilities you'd miss
Choosing Okta means going without PostgreSQL database, Authentication, Storage (which Supabase offers). Choosing Supabase means losing SSO, MFA, Lifecycle management. These are the features that typically drive the final decision — check whether your workflow depends on any of them before committing.
What company size tells you
Okta (5001-10000 employees) has the engineering bench to ship features across many fronts but may iterate slower on individual requests. Supabase (201-500 employees) typically ships faster on its core product but may lag on peripheral features. Consider which matters more for your roadmap.
Choose Okta if...
- You're ready to invest from $null/mo
- You value an intuitive, easy-to-use interface
- You need enterprise-grade capabilities
Choose Supabase if...
- You want a free tier to get started
- You value an intuitive, easy-to-use interface
- Getting strong value for money is a priority
Frequently asked questions
Is Okta or Supabase better?
Supabase scores 88/100 compared to Okta's 87/100 on VendorVS. However, the best choice depends on your needs — Okta excels at ease of use (8/10) while Supabase scores 8/10.
How much does Okta cost compared to Supabase?
Okta starts at free. Supabase starts at free (free tier available). Okta is the more affordable option.
Does Okta or Supabase have a free plan?
Supabase offers a free tier. Okta does not — its cheapest plan starts at $null/mo.
Related comparisons
See how Okta and Supabase compare to other developer tools tools.
Datadogvs
Okta
New RelicvsOktaOktavs
Twilio
GitLabvsOkta
CircleCIvsOktaOktavs
Terraform / HCP TerraformOktavs
Pulumi
ContentfulvsOkta