AWS Amplify vs Neon: Full Comparison (2026)
Pricing, features, scores, and a clear verdict on which one is right for you.
The bottom line
AWS Amplify positions itself as "full-stack hosting and backend for web and mobile apps on aws" while Neon goes after "serverless postgres with scale-to-zero and branching" — so the right pick depends on which problem you're actually solving. They take different commercial approaches — AWS Amplify uses a usage-based-based model and Neon a freemium approach, which affects how costs scale as your team grows.
At a glance
| AWS Amplify | Neon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 68/100 | 82/100 |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Full-stack hosting and backend for web and mobile apps on AWS | Serverless Postgres with scale-to-zero and branching |
Pricing comparison
Calculate your cost
Feature comparison
core
| Feature | AWS Amplify | Neon |
|---|---|---|
| Git push deploys | Yes | No |
| Preview environments | Yes | No |
| Custom domains | Yes | No |
| Automatic HTTPS | Yes | No |
| Build pipeline | Yes | No |
| PostgreSQL compatible | No | Yes |
| Scale to zero | No | Yes |
| Database branching | No | Yes |
| Autoscaling | No | Yes |
| Point-in-time restore | No | Yes |
advanced
| Feature | AWS Amplify | Neon |
|---|---|---|
| Auth (Cognito) | Yes | No |
| API (AppSync/API GW) | Yes | No |
| Storage (S3) | Yes | No |
| Functions (Lambda) | Yes | No |
| Hosting SSR | Yes | No |
| Read replicas | No | Yes |
| IP allowlisting | No | Launch+ |
| VPC peering | No | Scale+ |
| Logical replication | No | Yes |
| pgvector | No | Yes |
integrations
| Feature | AWS Amplify | Neon |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub | Yes | No |
| GitLab | Yes | No |
| Bitbucket | Yes | No |
| All AWS services | Yes | No |
| AWS CodeCommit | Yes | No |
| Vercel | No | Yes |
| Railway | No | Yes |
| Prisma | No | Yes |
| Drizzle | No | Yes |
| Next.js | No | Yes |
| Supabase | No | No |
Ratings breakdown
What the data tells us
Key capabilities you'd miss
Choosing AWS Amplify means going without PostgreSQL compatible, Scale to zero, Database branching (which Neon offers). Choosing Neon means losing Git push deploys, Preview environments, Custom domains. These are the features that typically drive the final decision — check whether your workflow depends on any of them before committing.
What company size tells you
Neon (51-200 employees) has the engineering bench to ship features across many fronts but may iterate slower on individual requests. AWS Amplify (100,000+ employees) typically ships faster on its core product but may lag on peripheral features. Consider which matters more for your roadmap.
Choose AWS Amplify if...
- You want a free tier to get started
- You value powerful features over simplicity
- Getting strong value for money is a priority
Choose Neon if...
- You want a free tier to get started
- You value an intuitive, easy-to-use interface
- Getting strong value for money is a priority
Frequently asked questions
Is AWS Amplify or Neon better?
Neon scores 82/100 compared to AWS Amplify's 68/100 on VendorVS. However, the best choice depends on your needs — AWS Amplify excels at ease of use (6/10) while Neon scores 9/10.
How much does AWS Amplify cost compared to Neon?
AWS Amplify starts at free (free tier available). Neon starts at free (free tier available). AWS Amplify is the more affordable option.
Does AWS Amplify or Neon have a free plan?
Yes, both AWS Amplify and Neon offer free tiers, so you can try each before committing to a paid plan.
Related comparisons
See how AWS Amplify and Neon compare to other developer tools tools.
AWS Amplifyvs
DatadogAWS Amplifyvs
New RelicAWS Amplifyvs
TwilioAWS Amplifyvs
GitLabAWS Amplifyvs
CircleCIAWS Amplifyvs
Terraform / HCP TerraformAWS Amplifyvs
PulumiAWS Amplifyvs
Contentful