AWS Amplify vs Grafana: Full Comparison (2026)
Pricing, features, scores, and a clear verdict on which one is right for you.
The bottom line
AWS Amplify positions itself as "full-stack hosting and backend for web and mobile apps on aws" while Grafana goes after "operational dashboards for everyone" — so the right pick depends on which problem you're actually solving. They take different commercial approaches — AWS Amplify uses a usage-based-based model and Grafana a freemium approach, which affects how costs scale as your team grows.
At a glance
| AWS Amplify | Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 68/100 | 88/100 |
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Best for | Full-stack hosting and backend for web and mobile apps on AWS | Operational dashboards for everyone |
Pricing comparison
Calculate your cost
Feature comparison
core
| Feature | AWS Amplify | Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Git push deploys | Yes | No |
| Preview environments | Yes | No |
| Custom domains | Yes | No |
| Automatic HTTPS | Yes | No |
| Build pipeline | Yes | No |
| Metrics dashboards | No | Yes |
| Alerting | No | Yes |
| Annotations | No | Yes |
| Plugins | No | Yes |
| Templating | No | Yes |
advanced
| Feature | AWS Amplify | Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Auth (Cognito) | Yes | No |
| API (AppSync/API GW) | Yes | No |
| Storage (S3) | Yes | No |
| Functions (Lambda) | Yes | No |
| Hosting SSR | Yes | No |
| Loki (logs) | No | Yes |
| Tempo (traces) | No | Yes |
| Mimir (metrics) | No | Yes |
| Incident management | No | Yes |
| ML anomaly detection | No | Yes |
integrations
| Feature | AWS Amplify | Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub | Yes | No |
| GitLab | Yes | No |
| Bitbucket | Yes | No |
| All AWS services | Yes | No |
| AWS CodeCommit | Yes | No |
| Prometheus | No | Yes |
| Datadog | No | Yes |
| Elasticsearch | No | Yes |
| CloudWatch | No | Yes |
| InfluxDB | No | Yes |
Ratings breakdown
What the data tells us
Key capabilities you'd miss
Choosing AWS Amplify means going without Metrics dashboards, Alerting, Annotations (which Grafana offers). Choosing Grafana means losing Git push deploys, Preview environments, Custom domains. These are the features that typically drive the final decision — check whether your workflow depends on any of them before committing.
What company size tells you
Grafana (501-1000 employees) has the engineering bench to ship features across many fronts but may iterate slower on individual requests. AWS Amplify (100,000+ employees) typically ships faster on its core product but may lag on peripheral features. Consider which matters more for your roadmap.
Choose AWS Amplify if...
- You want a free tier to get started
- You value powerful features over simplicity
- Getting strong value for money is a priority
Choose Grafana if...
- You want a free tier to get started
- You value powerful features over simplicity
- Getting strong value for money is a priority
Frequently asked questions
Is AWS Amplify or Grafana better?
Grafana scores 88/100 compared to AWS Amplify's 68/100 on VendorVS. However, the best choice depends on your needs — AWS Amplify excels at ease of use (6/10) while Grafana scores 7/10.
How much does AWS Amplify cost compared to Grafana?
AWS Amplify starts at free (free tier available). Grafana starts at free (free tier available). AWS Amplify is the more affordable option.
Does AWS Amplify or Grafana have a free plan?
Yes, both AWS Amplify and Grafana offer free tiers, so you can try each before committing to a paid plan.
Related comparisons
See how AWS Amplify and Grafana compare to other developer tools tools.
AWS Amplifyvs
DatadogAWS Amplifyvs
New RelicAWS Amplifyvs
TwilioAWS Amplifyvs
GitLabAWS Amplifyvs
CircleCIAWS Amplifyvs
Terraform / HCP TerraformAWS Amplifyvs
PulumiAWS Amplifyvs
Contentful