Okta vs PlanetScale: Full Comparison (2026)
Pricing, features, scores, and a clear verdict on which one is right for you.
The bottom line
Okta positions itself as "the identity standard" while PlanetScale goes after "serverless mysql platform with branching" — so the right pick depends on which problem you're actually solving. Both use subscription pricing, but Okta charges per seat while PlanetScale charges per cluster — a meaningful difference for larger teams. Okta (founded 2009) has had more time to build out its ecosystem and integrations, while PlanetScale (2018) tends to move faster on modern UX and newer workflows.
At a glance
| Okta | PlanetScale | |
|---|---|---|
| Our score | 87/100 | 73/100 |
| Starting price | Free | $39/mo |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Best for | The identity standard | Serverless MySQL platform with branching |
Pricing comparison
Calculate your cost
Feature comparison
core
| Feature | Okta | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| SSO | Yes | No |
| MFA | Yes | No |
| Lifecycle management | Yes | No |
| SCIM provisioning | Yes | No |
| App catalog (7000+) | Yes | No |
| MySQL compatible | No | Yes |
| Database branching | No | Yes |
| Non-blocking schema changes | No | Yes |
| Connection pooling | No | Yes |
| Auto-scaling | No | Yes |
advanced
| Feature | Okta | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Adaptive MFA | Yes | No |
| Device Trust | Yes | No |
| Privileged Access | Yes | No |
| Identity Governance | Yes | No |
| API Access Management | Yes | No |
| Vitess-powered sharding | No | Yes |
| Rewind (time travel) | No | Yes |
| Query analytics | No | Yes |
| Read replicas | No | Enterprise |
| Private networking | No | Enterprise |
integrations
| Feature | Okta | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Azure AD | Yes | No |
| Google Workspace | Yes | No |
| AWS | Yes | No |
| Salesforce | Yes | No |
| Workday | Yes | No |
| Prisma | No | Yes |
| Drizzle | No | Yes |
| Laravel | No | Yes |
| Rails | No | Yes |
| Vercel | No | Yes |
| Railway | No | Yes |
Ratings breakdown
What the data tells us
Key capabilities you'd miss
Choosing Okta means going without MySQL compatible, Database branching, Non-blocking schema changes (which PlanetScale offers). Choosing PlanetScale means losing SSO, MFA, Lifecycle management. These are the features that typically drive the final decision — check whether your workflow depends on any of them before committing.
What company size tells you
PlanetScale (51-200 employees) has the engineering bench to ship features across many fronts but may iterate slower on individual requests. Okta (5001-10000 employees) typically ships faster on its core product but may lag on peripheral features. Consider which matters more for your roadmap.
Choose Okta if...
- You're ready to invest from $null/mo
- You value an intuitive, easy-to-use interface
- You need enterprise-grade capabilities
Choose PlanetScale if...
- You're ready to invest from $39/mo
- You value powerful features over simplicity
- You need enterprise-grade capabilities
Frequently asked questions
Is Okta or PlanetScale better?
Okta scores 87/100 compared to PlanetScale's 73/100 on VendorVS. However, the best choice depends on your needs — Okta excels at ease of use (8/10) while PlanetScale scores 7/10.
How much does Okta cost compared to PlanetScale?
Okta starts at free. PlanetScale starts at $39/mo. Okta is the more affordable option.
Does Okta or PlanetScale have a free plan?
Neither Okta nor PlanetScale offers a free tier. Okta starts at $null/mo and PlanetScale at $39/mo.
Related comparisons
See how Okta and PlanetScale compare to other developer tools tools.
Datadogvs
Okta
New RelicvsOktaOktavs
Twilio
GitLabvsOkta
CircleCIvsOktaOktavs
Terraform / HCP TerraformOktavs
Pulumi
ContentfulvsOkta